It comes off as extremely arrogant to speak about public policy surrounding COVID in this way. There is no objective standard as to what 'progress' is on these matters. What you consider 'progress' is medical tyranny to many people. Who are you are you to deny the lived experience of millions of people and dismiss their closely held personal beliefs as 'misinformation?'
If you think the 'best and brightest' scientists and policy makers were at the forefront responding to COVID, I don't really know what to tell you... You have no idea what a bright scientist is. You are greatly lacking in discernment and demonstrate an obsequious deference to those claiming authority. You sound like you are pledging loyalty to a Gnostic cult or a Hermetic religion not a profit making enterprise. You write like a critical theorist. You write like a technocrat. You do not write like a scientist; not in the above text. This entire enterprise reads like merely a simulacrum of scientific research.
Why don't you come out and admit that you are in favor of a global carbon tax? Why don't you come out and admit you ultimately seek to make rentier claims on the Earth's soil biome as your corporation's privately held intellectual property?
An exceptional scientist who can also make graphs for layman
It comes off as extremely arrogant to speak about public policy surrounding COVID in this way. There is no objective standard as to what 'progress' is on these matters. What you consider 'progress' is medical tyranny to many people. Who are you are you to deny the lived experience of millions of people and dismiss their closely held personal beliefs as 'misinformation?'
If you think the 'best and brightest' scientists and policy makers were at the forefront responding to COVID, I don't really know what to tell you... You have no idea what a bright scientist is. You are greatly lacking in discernment and demonstrate an obsequious deference to those claiming authority. You sound like you are pledging loyalty to a Gnostic cult or a Hermetic religion not a profit making enterprise. You write like a critical theorist. You write like a technocrat. You do not write like a scientist; not in the above text. This entire enterprise reads like merely a simulacrum of scientific research.
Why don't you come out and admit that you are in favor of a global carbon tax? Why don't you come out and admit you ultimately seek to make rentier claims on the Earth's soil biome as your corporation's privately held intellectual property?